Component 1:
You are required to complete a 2,000 word essay (+/- 10%) that addresses the following question:
In his book Leadership in Organizations, Yukl (2013) conceptualises leadership by organisational level. These levels can be viewed as a hierarchy as depicted below:
| General Managerial Work Functions | Level (Yukl, 2013) |
|---|---|
| Chair, Board Director, Chief Executive Officer | Organization |
| Senior Manager | Group |
| Supervisor/Team Leader/Line Manager | Dyadic |
With reference to each of these leadership levels, consider an organisation you have knowledge of and analyse how the leadership has responded to today’s turbulent environments.
In your answers, please provide a brief overview of the organisation you have chosen to provide context.
Notes on answering the first essay well:
Presentation:
The presentation of the essay is worth 10% of the total mark. Please note the guidance below to score well.
- Begin with a table of contents to provide a clear high-level overview of the essay structure.
- Use the introduction to provide a summary of the question(s) you have been asked to consider and provide a succinct summary of the forthcoming structure.
- Avoid long paragraphs with multiple arguments and discussions. Keep your writing simple so that you can be understood by the reader and clearly label different sections of your essay
- Finish with a conclusion that captures a summary of the main point within your essay and directly answers the question(s) asked. There should be nothing new in the conclusion.
- Check your spelling and basic grammar are correct. If in doubt ask a friend to read your essay.
- Ensure you write no more than 2,200 words and no fewer than 1800 words.
Write My Assignment
Hire a Professional Essay & Assignment Writer for completing your Academic Assessments
Native Singapore Writers Team
- 100% Plagiarism-Free Essay
- Highest Satisfaction Rate
- Free Revision
- On-Time Delivery
Referencing:
The referencing within your essay is worth 10% of the total mark.
- This is an academic essay and you must consult academic text books to support your explanations and discussions of key terms and concepts. E.g. if you state that leadership has been researched for over one hundred years’ then you must provide evidence that backs up this claim, using intact citations (e.g. Northouse 2019).
- Please use the APATH referencing style that is clearly described in the guide that you can find on moodle.
- There is no maximum number of academic sources you can use for your essay, but if you use none, then you will be failed.
Knowledge and understanding:
This area is worth 40% of the total essay mark, so please take note of the following:
- Please consult academic text books to define and explain all the key terms in the essay.
- Use intent citations to identify the source of your explanations, definitions, assertions, discussions, arguments etc
- The important academic concepts for this essay are listed below and need careful explaining and discussing using academic literature to demonstrate your knowledge:
- Yuk’s leadership matrix (e.g. what is it? What is its purpose? What are the advantages and disadvantages of having a leadership matrix? Are there any limitations to its application and use? Has any other academic considered a leadership matrix to analyse different levels of leadership in an organisation? (see Howleson and Northouse e.g) If so, what similarities and differences does it have?)
- Environmental turbulence What is it? How is it defined? What explanations can you find in the literature?
- Can you find any examples to demonstrate your understanding of the different leadership levels in practice? E.g. search quality newspapers?
Analysis
This area is worth 40% of the total essay mark, and assesses how well you have answered the question.
The question asks you to consider an organisation you have knowledge of and consider how leadership at the different levels has responded to environmental turbulence.
- Provide no more than a paragraph to provide context on the organisation you have chosen
- Describe the environmental turbulence. There are many examples you can consider e.g. you might refer to rising inflation: Covid 19 or new environmental regulations – It’s completely up to you
- You must have a paragraph on each of the three leadership levels in the question (organisation; group and dyadic) and discuss how those three levels of leadership responded to the environmental turbulence. It’s helpful to use each of the three leadership levels as individual sub-section headings in your essay
Buy Custom Answer of This Assessment & Raise Your Grades
Get A Free Quote - Finally, consider how effective/helpful the leadership matrix itself is when you apply it to a real organisation responding to turbulence. You may like to list some of the weaknesses and strengths of the theory. What do you think? Is it good / helpful or does it have limitations? If so what are they?
- End with a succinct conclusion that summaries the main points in the essay and directly answers the essay question(s). There must be nothing new introduced in your conclusion.
Marking Criteria
| DISTINCTION | PASS | FAIL | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Presentation | Effective style, neat legible presentation; correct spelling; grammar and punctuation accurate; meaning clear and fluid with an articulate academic writing style. | Effective layout; neat legible presentation; occasional spelling errors; grammar and punctuation are mainly accurate; meaning coherent and mainly fluent writing style. | Poor layout; untidy and difficult to read; much incorrect spelling; poor grammar and punctuation; meaning unclear; language lacks fluency. |
| Referencing | Inclusion of appropriate and current literature which is accurately integrated into the text; all citations acknowledged; APA citation method used consistently. | Evidence of appropriate literature, which accurately integrated into the text; most sources acknowledged; APA citation method used consistently. | Literature either not consulted or is irrelevant to the case study analysis; APA citation method very poorly and/or not used. |
| Knowledge & understanding/ application of subject knowledge | Exceptionally good grasp of related learning outcomes; evidence of learning very good with clear; thorough and original critique of case study findings; demonstrates knowledge of an extensive range of literature with the ability to draw on sources of the subject and go beyond these to new knowledge and understanding | Demonstrates good knowledge and understanding of related learning outcomes; evidence of learning is good; case study findings are clearly stated and demonstrates some ability to link together knowledge from a range of subject areas; some evidence of knowledge in leading edge developments. | Evidence that knowledge and understanding is incomplete or superficial; lack of ability to link and integrate knowledge from a range of areas into a holistic view of leadership; poorly developed critique of case study. |
| Analysis & Problem Solving | Evidence of an outstanding level of critical reflection and analysis relevant to professional practice | Evidence of some critical reflection and analysis relevant to professional practice. | Insufficient level of evidence of critical reflection and analysis relevant to professional practice. |
Stuck with a lot of homework assignments and feeling stressed ?
Take professional academic assistance & Get 100% Plagiarism free papers
Get A Free Quote
The post Leadership Responses to Environmental Turbulence Using Yukl’s Leadership Matrix appeared first on Singapore Assignment Help.
Leadership Responses to Environmental Turbulence Using Yukl’s Leadership Matrix