Assessment 1: Online oral presentation | |
Assignment type | Poster presentation |
Weighting | 30% |
Word count / length | Equivalent 1200 words; 10 minutes |
SILOs | 1, 2, 3, 4 |
Due date | Wednesday of Week 4, 23:59 (Melbourne time*) *For current Melbourne time, please check information under the Assessment tile in the LMS of this subject. |
Topic overview
Focusing on one consumer group presented across the first four weeks of this subject, create a visual poster of the learning strategies you have developed in the subject about what it means to have a genuine advocacy lens for a mental health service consumer. If you are a teacher, consider a student family group with a particular mental health need. You will then record a 10-minute presentation of your poster using Zoom.
Assessment criteria
This assessment will measure your ability to:
Guidelines
You will have two products for assessment:
Firstly, introduce your topic and have a heading that reflects the topic.
As you take the viewer through your poster, identify the consumer group and think about the key areas of need the group would have for advocacy or to promote self-advocacy. These will become your sections for your poster. For example, people with depression may need encouragement to negotiate with health professionals or to consider medication adherence regimes. People who are carers may need to better understand the healthcare system. The team working with the adolescent who has a previous trauma history may need to understand their reactions to new and stressful events. The topics that were covered in this subject are as following and you should choose to focus on one of these topics:
Note: Some of these topics will not be presented until Weeks 5 and 6. You can still choose one of these later topics if you wish but you may need to do more independent research.
Have a clearly identified conclusion on your poster that also outlines the benefits of advocacy for this group.
Finally, include the reference list on your poster (in APA7 style) of everything that was cited within the text of the poster.
There are some very good web pages about developing a poster and how to present it. There are also resources online on how to use PowerPoint to develop a poster, and great examples of posters people have put together for conferences and other presentations. We will look at some of these over the term.
Developing a poster
A poster is different to an academic assignment but you still should use academic professional language. Some good points are to:
The following YouTube video is useful for developing an academic poster. You should think about this as you are not reporting a research project but rather presenting a poster on what you have learnt from your work, your ideas and key messages:
Looking For MMH4MHD Mental Health Diagnosis Assignment Help
Play Video
Using PowerPoint to make a poster
Rubric
Assessment criteria / grading rubric | |||||
CRITERIA | A: Excellent (>80%) | B: Very good (70–79%) | C: Good (60–69%) | D: Acceptable (50–59%) | N: Unacceptable (<50%) |
Introduction (5 marks) |
Vivid and excellent introduction as first section of presented poster with clear aims and one focus. (4–5 marks) | Very good introduction with clear aims and one focus as first section of presented poster. (3.5 marks) | Good introduction with aims and one focus as first section of presented poster. (3 marks) | Adequate introduction but unclear aims. Lacks focus. (2.5 marks) | Section is not clear and does not develop. May lack focus. (0-2 marks) Did not address = 0 marks If not a presentation of a poster = 0 marks |
Identifies consumer group and key areas of need (5 marks) |
Clearly identifies the consumer group and can identify the key areas of need for this group. (4–5 marks) | Provides a very good introduction to the consumer group and can identify the key areas of need for this group. (3.5 marks) | Provides a good introduction to the consumer group and can identify some of the key areas of need for this group. (3 marks) | Provides reference to the consumer group but key areas of need for this group are not clear or presented appropriately. (2.5 marks) | Section is not clear and does not develop. (0-2 marks) Did not address = 0 marks If not a presentation of a poster = 0 marks |
Advocacy statements for each area of need (10 marks) |
Excellent use of relevant evidence to support the advocacy statements presented. (8–10 marks) | Very good use of relevant evidence to support the advocacy statements presented. (7 marks) | Good use of relevant evidence to support the advocacy statements presented. (6 marks) | Adequate use of relevant evidence to support the advocacy statements presented. (5 marks) | Section is not clear and does not develop. (0-5 marks) Did not address = 0 marks If not a presentation of a poster = 0 marks |
Concluding statement considering the benefits (5 marks) |
Includes an excellent conclusion with well- considered benefits that relate to the advocacy statements made. (4–5 marks) | Includes a very good conclusion with several considered benefits that relate to the advocacy statements made. (3.5 marks) | Includes a good conclusion with a few considered benefits that relate to the advocacy statements made. (3 marks) | Includes an acceptable conclusion with some considered benefits that don’t always relate to the advocacy statements made. (2.5 marks) | Inadequate or missing conclusion. (0-2 marks) No heading provided so marker has to find the conclusion. (0 marks) If not a presentation of a poster = 0 marks |
Poster presentation and quality use of literature and referencing (5 marks) |
At a level seen at a conference. Poster presentation is compelling, creative and appropriate for a professional audience. Presenter needs to be visible and present the poster. (4–5 marks) | Poster presentation is generally polished but may have minor issues with presentation. The poster is interesting and appropriate for a professional audience. Presenter needs to be visible and present the poster. (3.5 marks) | Poster is lacking in one or two areas (style, font, use of colour, content, lack of citation). Presenter needs to be visible and present the poster. (3 marks) | Delivery is lacking in three or more areas (style, font, use of colour, content, lack of citation). Presenter needs to be visible and present the poster. (2.5 marks) | Did not deliver or delivery has significant problems and is inappropriate for the intended audience. (0-2 marks) OR Poor use of literature (0-2 marks) OR Presenter needs to be visible and present the poster. (0 marks) OR If not a presentation of a poster = 0 marks OR If in-text citation does not match end-text citation = 0 marks |
The post MMH4EPM Experiences and Perceptions of Mental Illness Assignment first appeared on Diploma Assignment Help.