Experiential Paper
For this assignment, you will conduct a mock interview with a friend or family member using two of the following tools: Alcohol Use Disorder Identification Test, T-ACE, and/or Michigan Alcohol Screening Test. Compose a 1000-2000 word paper detailing the individual experience of administering 2 alcohol screening tools.In your paper, briefly describe the tools and describe their experience administering each tool. Identify the strengths and weaknesses of each toolIdentify what questions were difficult to ask during the mock interview and whyMake suggestions for future versions of the tool.
Format requirements:
APA format styleSeparate title page 12-point fontNumbered pages1″ margins
Citations and References
Include APA citations and references where appropriate, including references for the screening tools you select.
The Experiential Paper will be graded according to the following criteria:
Excellent
25 points
Good
21 points
Fair
17 points
Poor
13 points
Missing or Not Acceptable
0 points
Identifies and describes two alcohol assessment tools
Excellent description of two assessment tools.
Good description of two assessment tools, with minor details missing.
Fair description of two assessment tools, with 1 or 2 major details missing.
-OR-
Excellent description of only one screening tool.
Poor description of two assessment tools, with several major details missing
-OR-
Good description of only one screening tool, with minor details missing.
No description of screening tools.
-OR-
Description is not understandable due to serious writing errors.
Describes the experience of administering each tool.
Excellent description of the experience of administering each tool.
Good description of the experience of administering each tool, with minor details missing.
Fair description of the experience of administering each tool, with 1 or 2 major details missing.
-OR-
Excellent description of the experience of administering only one tool.
Poor description of the experience of administering each tool, with several major details missing.
-OR-
Good description of the experience of administering only one tool, with minor details missing.
No description of the experience of administering screening tools.
-OR-
Description is not understandable due to serious writing errors.
Identifies the strengths and weaknesses of each tool
Excellent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool.
Good analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, with minor details missing.
Fair analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, with 1 or 2 major details missing.
-OR-
Excellent analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of only one tool.
Poor analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool, with several major details missing.
-OR-
Good analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of only one tool.
No analysis of the strengths and weaknesses of each tool.
-OR-
Analysis is not understandable due to serious writing errors.
Identifies the questions that were difficult to ask during the mock interview and why
Excellent description of the questions that were difficult to ask and why.
Good description of the questions that were difficult to ask and why, with minor details missing.
Fair description of the questions that were difficult to ask and why, with 1 or 2 major details missing.
Poor description of the questions that were difficult to ask and why, with several major details missing.
No description of the questions that were difficult to ask and why.
-OR-
Description is not understandable due to serious writing errors.
Makes suggestions for future versions of each tool
Excellent suggestions for improvements for each tool.
Good suggestions for improvements for each tool, with minor details missing.
Fair suggestions for improvements for each tool, with 1 or 2 major details missing.
-OR-
Excellent suggestions for improvements for only one tool.
Poor suggestions for improvements for each tool, with several major details missing.
-OR-
Good suggestions for improvements for only one too, with minor details missing.
No suggestions for improvements for each tool.
-OR-
Suggestions are not understandable due to serious writing errors.
Writing Style
All of the following criteria are met:
Meets length requirement
Properly formatted
Correct citations and references
Concise, with few or no writing errors
Three of the following criteria are met:
Meets length requirement
Properly formatted
Correct citations and references
Concise, with few or no writing errors
Two of the following criteria are met:
Meets length requirement
Properly formatted
Correct citations and references
Concise, with few or no writing errors
One of the following criteria are met:
Meets length requirement
Properly formatted
Correct citations and references
Concise, with few or no writing errors
None of the following criteria are met:
Meets length requirement
Properly formatted
Correct citations and references
Concise, with few or no writing